IntermediateTrussDeterminateMethod of joints

Warren truss by the method of joints

The Warren truss is triangulation at its purest: equal diagonals, no verticals, and a force pattern you can read like a sentence — chords carry the bending, diagonals carry the shear, alternating tension and compression as they zig and zag. We solve every member by the method of joints, then check the answer against the beam it secretly is.

Figure 1.The problem: a Warren truss with nodes numbered 1–9, the 20 kN panel-point loads, and the pin/roller supports. Member forces, reactions and the deflected shape come after we solve.
Given
Span
16 m (4 panels × 4 m)
Height
3 m
Bottom chord
nodes 1–5
Top chord
nodes 6–9
Supports
Pin @ 1 · Roller @ 5
Loads
20 kN ↓ at nodes 2, 3, 4
Diagonal
cos 0.5547 · sin 0.8321length √(2² + 3²) = 3.606 m
1

Step 1 — The reactions, by symmetry

Three equal loads on a symmetric truss — the ends split them evenly.

Before any member force, pin down the supports. Three 20 kN loads hang from the bottom chord, so the two ends together must push up with 60 kN. The truss is symmetric and so is its loading, so there is nothing to break the tie — each end carries exactly half:

With the reactions known, every joint has at most two unknown member forces — the truss is statically determinate (15 members + 3 reactions = 18 = 2 × 9 joints), so the method of joints will unwind it completely.

2

Step 2 — One angle, then the first joint

Every diagonal shares the same geometry — and joint 1 has only two unknowns.

First, the geometry that serves the whole walk. Every diagonal in this Warren truss runs 2 m across and 3 m up, so each is long, giving and . Compute those two numbers once — they appear in every equation below.

The method of joints wants a pin with at most two unknowns, and joint 1 is exactly that: the 30 kN reaction pushes up, and only the end diagonal and the first bottom-chord member meet there. The diagonal is the only member with a vertical component, so it alone must cancel the reaction:

Let the signs do the talking: we write every force as tension-positive, so the negative answer means the end diagonal is in compression — it leans into the support like a strut — while it shoves the bottom chord outward into tension.

Figure 2.Member labels — the two-number naming (start node - end node) used throughout the joint equations.
3

Step 3 — Up to joint 6, back down to joint 2

Each solved joint unlocks the next: two equations per pin, one pin at a time.

Move up to joint 6, which carries no load. Its two diagonals must balance vertically, and the top chord closes the horizontal:

Joint 2 hangs the first 20 kN load. Its vertical equation gives the inner diagonal, its horizontal equation the bottom-chord center:

Notice the rhythm the walk has settled into: at an unloaded top joint the diagonals simply hand their vertical components across; at a loaded bottom joint the pair must also swallow the 20 kN hanging there. Zig, zag, repeat — that alternation is the Warren truss’s whole story, and Step 5 reads it in full.

4

Step 4 — Joint 7, then symmetry finishes the job

One more pin and the mirror solves the right half for free.

Continuing to joint 7 and applying the same two equations gives the top-chord center F₇₋₈ = −53.33 kN (C) and confirms the inner diagonals at ±12.02 kN. And that is where the hand work ends: the truss and its loading are both symmetric about midspan, so every member on the right must carry exactly what its mirror twin on the left carries. Walking past the centerline would only re-derive numbers we already own — all 15 member forces are on the table.

5

Step 5 — Reading the tension/compression pattern

Chords carry the bending, diagonals carry the shear.

Step back and the whole force field reads like a sentence. The bottom chord is in tension, growing from +20 kN at the ends to +46.67 kN at the center; the top chord is in compression, from −40 kN to −53.33 kN — the flanges of the beam-in-disguise. The diagonals alternate tension and compression as they zig and zag, shedding the shear that decreases toward midspan (hence the small ±12.02 kN inner diagonals versus the ±36.06 kN at the ends).

The results figure below draws every one of those numbers on the frame — members colored by sign (red tension, blue compression, exactly as the Truss Calculator colors them), the support reactions, and the exaggerated deflected shape dashed over the truss.

Figure 3.The solved Warren truss — member forces colored red (tension) / blue (compression), the 30 kN reactions, and the deflected shape (dashed, exaggerated). This is the problem figure with the answer on it.

The proof

Hand calculation vs the solver, all 15 members.

Verified — hand calculation vs the solver, to round-off
QuantityBy handStructureCalcs
Reactions30 / 30 kN30 / 30 kN
End diagonals (1-6, 9-5)−36.06 kN (C)−36.056 kN
Bottom chord ends (1-2, 4-5)+20.0 kN (T)+20.0 kN
Bottom chord center (2-3, 3-4)+46.67 kN (T)+46.667 kN
Top chord center (7-8)−53.33 kN (C) — M/h check: 160/3−53.333 kN
Inner diagonals±12.02 kN±12.019 kN

Every value was worked by hand with the classical method, then checked against this site’s solver — the same engine the Try it button opens. This agreement is re-run automatically on every build.

Now make it yours

Open this exact model in the calculator — then change a load, drag a support, and watch every diagram update in real time. The best way to build intuition is to break it and see what happens.

Take it with you

Export this worked example as a PDF, or download it as a .screport and open it in the Report Builder — the model travels inside the file, so you can reconstruct it, re-solve, and build your own report from it.

Verifying your link…