AdvancedBeamIndeterminateWelded connectionStepped sections

A welded moment splice in a continuous beam

Two spans, two very different sections — a deep 610UB125 and a 410UB53.7 with about a fifth of its I — meeting at the middle support on a welded moment splice. The full-strength weld keeps the beam continuous, so this one is genuinely indeterminate: we read the connection, write the three-moment theorem with both stiffnesses in it, and watch the I’s cancel exactly. The moments come out symmetric; the deflections do not — and that gap is the whole lesson.

Figure 1.The problem: two 6 m spans over a pin at A and rollers at B and C, carrying 15 kN/m throughout. Span 1 is a 610UB125, span 2 a 410UB53.7 — and the joint at B, drawn as one heavy line across the interface, is a welded moment splice: full continuity.
Given
Span 1
610UB125A (pin, 0) → B (roller, 6 m); Ix = 988.3 × 10⁶ mm⁴
Span 2
410UB53.7B → C (roller, 12 m); Ix = 188.4 × 10⁶ mm⁴
Joint at B
Welded moment splicefull-strength butt weld — full continuity
15 kN/mUDL over the full 12 m
200 GPa
Supports
Pin · Roller · Rollerat 0, 6 and 12 m
1

Step 1 — Read the splice before you touch the numbers

The drawing tells you the structural model: a full-strength weld carries moment, so the beam stays one.

Look at the joint over the middle support B. The section steps down — a deep 610UB125 arriving from the left, a shallower 410UB53.7 leaving to the right — and across the interface the drawing shows exactly one clean, heavy line. That line is the site’s language for a welded moment splice: a full-strength butt weld joining flange to flange and web to web. No plate, no bolts, no cope — the two sections are fused into one piece of steel.

Compare it with the fin plate of the Gerber example, where unconnected flanges meant no moment path and statics alone could finish the job. Here the flanges are connected, so bending moment crosses the joint at full strength. The structural model is one continuous beam over three supports — statically indeterminate, one redundancy — and we will need more than statics to solve it.

Figure 2.Close-up of the joint at B — the same drawing as Figure 1, zoomed, not redrawn. The welded moment splice: a full-strength butt weld drawn as one heavy line across the interface and the depth step. Unlike a fin plate, a full-penetration weld makes the two sections one continuous beam, so the model keeps moment continuity here.
2

Step 2 — Three-moment, two stiffnesses

Clapeyron with unequal I — and a cancellation worth remembering.

One redundancy calls for one compatibility equation, and for continuous beams the classic is Clapeyron’s three-moment theorem. In its general form the stiffness of each span appears explicitly — every term carries its own I. For our two spans (ends simply supported, so , with a UDL w on both):

Now put in what this beam actually is: = 6 m and the same w on both spans, but — that is the whole point of the splice. The equation becomes

Look at both sides: the stiffness factor appears on the left and on the right — so it cancels exactly, whatever the two values are:

That is the lesson of this page in one line: for equal spans under equal load, the I’s cancel and the stiffness step does not move the moments at all. We never used 988.3 or 188.4 — the answer is the same as if the beam were prismatic.

3

Step 3 — Reactions

With M_B known, each span is a free body and statics finishes the job.

Cut the beam at B and take span A–B as a free body: a simply supported 6 m span under its UDL plus the known hogging moment at the B end. Moments about B:

Span B–C carries the same load and the same end moment, so by the same free body kN. The middle support takes the rest:

Global check: 2 × 33.75 + 112.5 = 180 kN = 15 × 12 ✓. Every reaction is symmetric — a first hint that the moments do not know one span is five times stiffer than the other.

4

Step 4 — The diagrams

Symmetric moments on an asymmetric beam.

Walk the shear from the left: it starts at +33.75, the UDL bleeds it away, and over B it jumps by the full 112.5 kN reaction, then plays the mirror image out to C. It crosses zero where the sagging moment peaks:

The moment diagram hogs to −67.5 kN·m over B and rises to twin sagging peaks of 37.97 kN·m — at 2.25 m in the deep span and, mirrored, at 9.75 m in the shallow one. Perfectly symmetric moments on a beam that is anything but symmetric.

Figure 3.Shear force diagram — the shear jumps by the full 112.5 kN reaction over B and crosses zero at 2.25 m and 9.75 m, under the two moment peaks.
Figure 4.Bending moment diagram — hogging −67.5 kN·m over B, twin sagging peaks of 37.97 kN·m at 2.25 m and 9.75 m: symmetric moments on an asymmetric beam.
5

Step 5 — Where the stiffness step shows

Same moments, about a fifth of the I — the deflected shape tells the truth.

So does the splice change nothing? Look at the deflected shape. Curvature is : both spans carry identical moments, but the 410UB53.7 has an I about five times smaller than the 610UB125 — so at every matching station it curves about five times as hard. The deep span barely moves; the shallow span sags visibly under the very same bending moments.

And note what does not happen at B: no kink. The welded splice keeps the slope continuous through the support — the exact opposite of the Gerber page, where the fin-plate hinge announced itself with a slope break. The moments are symmetric; the deflections are not. That asymmetry is the stiffness step, finally showing itself in the one place it can.

Figure 5.Deflection diagram — same moments, different stiffness: the 410UB53.7 span sags visibly more than the 610UB125 span. The moments were symmetric; the deflections are not.
Figure 6.The solved beam: reactions 33.75 / 112.5 / 33.75 kN and the deflected centerline — near-flat over the deep span, dipping over the shallow one, with no kink at B: the welded splice carries the slope smoothly through the support.

The proof

Four hand numbers vs the solver.

Verified — hand calculation vs the solver, to round-off
QuantityBy handStructureCalcs
Reactions R_A = R_C33.75 kN (3wL/8)33.75 kN
Reaction R_B112.5 kN (10wL/8)112.5 kN
Hogging M_B−67.5 kN·m (wL²/8 — the I’s cancel)−67.5 kN·m at 6 m
Max sagging37.97 kN·m at 2.25 m (9wL²/128)37.97 kN·m at 2.25 m

Every value was worked by hand with the classical method, then checked against this site’s solver — the same engine the Try it button opens. This agreement is re-run automatically on every build.

Now make it yours

Open this exact model in the calculator — then change a load, drag a support, and watch every diagram update in real time. The best way to build intuition is to break it and see what happens.

Take it with you

Export this worked example as a PDF, or download it as a .screport and open it in the Report Builder — the model travels inside the file, so you can reconstruct it, re-solve, and build your own report from it.

Verifying your link…